THOMAS J LAHEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

267
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

48

11%

LEVEL 2

132

30%

LEVEL 3

201

45%

LEVEL 4

66

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

62

14%

LEVEL 2

134

29%

LEVEL 3

203

44%

LEVEL 4

60

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

132
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

59

28%

LEVEL 3

96

45%

LEVEL 4

36

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

133
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

26

12%

LEVEL 2

57

26%

LEVEL 3

102

47%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

135
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

27

11%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

105

45%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

130
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

36

15%

LEVEL 2

77

32%

LEVEL 3

101

42%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

6

23%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

18

60%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

16

48%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

198
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

82

28%

LEVEL 3

144

48%

LEVEL 4

54

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

197
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

78

26%

LEVEL 3

149

50%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

8

32%

LEVEL 2

11

44%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

23

29%

LEVEL 2

25

32%

LEVEL 3

28

36%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

23

29%

LEVEL 2

28

36%

LEVEL 3

22

28%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

28

7%

LEVEL 2

105

27%

LEVEL 3

194

50%

LEVEL 4

64

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

254
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

38

10%

LEVEL 2

108

27%

LEVEL 3

194

49%

LEVEL 4

60

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

20

36%

LEVEL 2

27

48%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

24

41%

LEVEL 2

26

44%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

265
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

36

8%

LEVEL 2

128

30%

LEVEL 3

199

46%

LEVEL 4

66

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

261
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

49

11%

LEVEL 2

122

28%

LEVEL 3

201

47%

LEVEL 4

60

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

12

67%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

13

48%

LEVEL 2

12

44%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

247
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

27

7%

LEVEL 2

100

27%

LEVEL 3

182

49%

LEVEL 4

65

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

241
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

100

26%

LEVEL 3

182

48%

LEVEL 4

59

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

21

29%

LEVEL 2

32

44%

LEVEL 3

19

26%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

25

31%

LEVEL 2

34

42%

LEVEL 3

21

26%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.