CANDLEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

33

10%

LEVEL 2

86

25%

LEVEL 3

110

32%

LEVEL 4

118

34%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

241
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

78

22%

LEVEL 3

102

29%

LEVEL 4

139

40%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

120
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

27

17%

LEVEL 3

59

38%

LEVEL 4

61

39%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

130
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

29

17%

LEVEL 3

48

29%

LEVEL 4

82

49%

MALE

PROFICIENT

108
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

59

31%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

57

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

22

12%

LEVEL 2

49

27%

LEVEL 3

54

30%

LEVEL 4

57

31%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

73
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

18

19%

LEVEL 3

32

33%

LEVEL 4

41

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

76
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

17

17%

LEVEL 3

29

30%

LEVEL 4

47

48%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

97
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

38

26%

LEVEL 3

54

36%

LEVEL 4

43

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

26

18%

LEVEL 3

46

33%

LEVEL 4

54

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

7

15%

LEVEL 2

12

25%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

16

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

17

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

7

19%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

10

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

16

39%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

11

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

74

23%

LEVEL 3

107

34%

LEVEL 4

116

37%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

60

19%

LEVEL 3

96

31%

LEVEL 4

137

44%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

13

43%

LEVEL 2

12

40%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

13

33%

LEVEL 2

18

46%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

238
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

30

9%

LEVEL 2

77

22%

LEVEL 3

100

29%

LEVEL 4

138

40%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

193
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

66

23%

LEVEL 3

94

33%

LEVEL 4

99

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

205
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

49

17%

LEVEL 3

81

29%

LEVEL 4

124

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

11

17%

LEVEL 2

20

30%

LEVEL 3

16

24%

LEVEL 4

19

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

29

42%

LEVEL 3

21

30%

LEVEL 4

15

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.