JAMES H BOYD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

88

29%

LEVEL 3

138

45%

LEVEL 4

65

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

25

8%

LEVEL 2

77

26%

LEVEL 3

117

39%

LEVEL 4

79

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

114
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

31

21%

LEVEL 3

73

48%

LEVEL 4

41

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

34

21%

LEVEL 3

61

38%

LEVEL 4

57

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

57

36%

LEVEL 3

65

41%

LEVEL 4

24

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

43

31%

LEVEL 3

56

41%

LEVEL 4

22

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

17

43%

LEVEL 4

12

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

18

51%

LEVEL 4

9

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

125
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

41

23%

LEVEL 3

82

47%

LEVEL 4

43

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

120
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

43

24%

LEVEL 3

66

37%

LEVEL 4

54

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

32

43%

LEVEL 3

29

39%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

23

39%

LEVEL 4

11

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

200
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

78

27%

LEVEL 3

135

46%

LEVEL 4

65

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

73

26%

LEVEL 3

111

39%

LEVEL 4

77

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

10

59%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

198
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

74

26%

LEVEL 3

133

47%

LEVEL 4

65

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

187
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

68

25%

LEVEL 3

110

40%

LEVEL 4

77

28%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

6

24%

LEVEL 2

14

56%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

160
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

59

26%

LEVEL 3

103

45%

LEVEL 4

57

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

162
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

56

24%

LEVEL 3

92

40%

LEVEL 4

70

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

9

11%

LEVEL 2

29

36%

LEVEL 3

35

43%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

11

17%

LEVEL 2

21

32%

LEVEL 3

25

38%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.