SPRINGS UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

55

16%

LEVEL 2

115

34%

LEVEL 3

114

33%

LEVEL 4

57

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

64

18%

LEVEL 2

115

32%

LEVEL 3

111

31%

LEVEL 4

68

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

23

13%

LEVEL 2

54

31%

LEVEL 3

63

36%

LEVEL 4

34

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

23

14%

LEVEL 2

44

26%

LEVEL 3

59

35%

LEVEL 4

41

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

32

19%

LEVEL 2

61

37%

LEVEL 3

51

31%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

41

21%

LEVEL 2

71

37%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

78
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

38

30%

LEVEL 3

49

39%

LEVEL 4

29

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

91
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

41

20%

LEVEL 2

77

37%

LEVEL 3

63

30%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

91
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

49

22%

LEVEL 2

80

36%

LEVEL 3

62

28%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

33

11%

LEVEL 2

94

32%

LEVEL 3

108

37%

LEVEL 4

56

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

40

13%

LEVEL 2

95

31%

LEVEL 3

104

34%

LEVEL 4

67

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

22

44%

LEVEL 2

21

42%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

24

46%

LEVEL 2

20

38%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

167
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

97

33%

LEVEL 3

110

37%

LEVEL 4

57

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

175
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

37

12%

LEVEL 2

92

30%

LEVEL 3

108

36%

LEVEL 4

67

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

23

51%

LEVEL 2

18

40%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

27

50%

LEVEL 2

23

43%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

159
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

45

15%

LEVEL 2

99

33%

LEVEL 3

105

35%

LEVEL 4

54

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

163
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

56

18%

LEVEL 2

99

31%

LEVEL 3

97

31%

LEVEL 4

66

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

10

26%

LEVEL 2

16

42%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

8

20%

LEVEL 2

16

40%

LEVEL 3

14

35%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.