Skip to Content
Main content

EAST HAMPTON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

48

16%

LEVEL 2

85

29%

LEVEL 3

102

35%

LEVEL 4

59

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

47

17%

LEVEL 2

77

28%

LEVEL 3

77

28%

LEVEL 4

77

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

16

11%

LEVEL 2

48

32%

LEVEL 3

53

35%

LEVEL 4

33

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

21

15%

LEVEL 2

38

27%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

43

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

32

22%

LEVEL 2

37

26%

LEVEL 3

49

34%

LEVEL 4

26

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

26

19%

LEVEL 2

39

28%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

34

25%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

83
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

21

19%

LEVEL 3

50

44%

LEVEL 4

33

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

17

17%

LEVEL 3

29

29%

LEVEL 4

46

46%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

66
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

37

23%

LEVEL 2

56

35%

LEVEL 3

46

29%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

65
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

39

24%

LEVEL 2

58

36%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

24

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

33

12%

LEVEL 2

77

29%

LEVEL 3

98

37%

LEVEL 4

58

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

70

28%

LEVEL 3

74

30%

LEVEL 4

73

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

15

54%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

14

50%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

159
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

23

9%

LEVEL 2

74

29%

LEVEL 3

100

39%

LEVEL 4

59

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

153
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

76

32%

LEVEL 4

77

32%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

25

66%

LEVEL 2

11

29%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

26

68%

LEVEL 2

11

29%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

17

11%

LEVEL 2

33

21%

LEVEL 3

68

43%

LEVEL 4

40

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

35

24%

LEVEL 3

39

27%

LEVEL 4

58

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

31

23%

LEVEL 2

52

38%

LEVEL 3

34

25%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

33

25%

LEVEL 2

42

32%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.