EAST HAMPTON UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

278
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 577

LEVEL 1

110

19%

LEVEL 2

189

33%

LEVEL 3

199

34%

LEVEL 4

79

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

262
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

101

19%

LEVEL 2

159

30%

LEVEL 3

167

32%

LEVEL 4

95

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

149
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

38

14%

LEVEL 2

94

33%

LEVEL 3

104

37%

LEVEL 4

45

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

134
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

39

16%

LEVEL 2

78

31%

LEVEL 3

80

32%

LEVEL 4

54

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

72

24%

LEVEL 2

95

32%

LEVEL 3

95

32%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

128
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

62

23%

LEVEL 2

81

30%

LEVEL 3

87

32%

LEVEL 4

41

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

130
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

43

22%

LEVEL 3

88

46%

LEVEL 4

42

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

118
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

36

21%

LEVEL 3

61

36%

LEVEL 4

57

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

6

55%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

129
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

83

24%

LEVEL 2

132

38%

LEVEL 3

99

29%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

121
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

82

26%

LEVEL 2

115

36%

LEVEL 3

91

29%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

271
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

70

14%

LEVEL 2

170

33%

LEVEL 3

193

38%

LEVEL 4

78

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

68

15%

LEVEL 2

144

31%

LEVEL 3

161

35%

LEVEL 4

91

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

40

61%

LEVEL 2

19

29%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

33

57%

LEVEL 2

15

26%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

268
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

53

11%

LEVEL 2

150

32%

LEVEL 3

189

40%

LEVEL 4

79

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

250
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

44

11%

LEVEL 2

117

28%

LEVEL 3

155

38%

LEVEL 4

95

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

57

54%

LEVEL 2

39

37%

LEVEL 3

10

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

12
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

57

51%

LEVEL 2

42

38%

LEVEL 3

12

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

166
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

37

14%

LEVEL 2

71

26%

LEVEL 3

117

43%

LEVEL 4

49

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

155
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

62

25%

LEVEL 3

86

34%

LEVEL 4

69

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

73

24%

LEVEL 2

118

39%

LEVEL 3

82

27%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

68

25%

LEVEL 2

97

36%

LEVEL 3

81

30%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.