Skip to Content
Main content

CENTER MORICHES UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

78

28%

LEVEL 2

93

33%

LEVEL 3

90

32%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

68

26%

LEVEL 2

88

34%

LEVEL 3

83

32%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

37

25%

LEVEL 2

52

36%

LEVEL 3

43

29%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

30

24%

LEVEL 2

39

31%

LEVEL 3

46

37%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

41

30%

LEVEL 2

41

30%

LEVEL 3

47

35%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

38

29%

LEVEL 2

49

37%

LEVEL 3

37

28%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

96
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

40

21%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

78

40%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

39

21%

LEVEL 2

65

34%

LEVEL 3

70

37%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

29

47%

LEVEL 2

27

44%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

21

46%

LEVEL 2

16

35%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

55

23%

LEVEL 2

82

34%

LEVEL 3

85

35%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

50

22%

LEVEL 2

80

35%

LEVEL 3

82

36%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

23

58%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

18

62%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

109
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

60

24%

LEVEL 2

85

33%

LEVEL 3

89

35%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

100
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

58

24%

LEVEL 2

84

35%

LEVEL 3

81

33%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

18

67%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

10

63%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

38

18%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

81

39%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

39

19%

LEVEL 2

67

33%

LEVEL 3

79

39%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

40

53%

LEVEL 2

25

33%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

29

53%

LEVEL 2

21

38%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.