WILLIAM PACA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

163

52%

LEVEL 2

85

27%

LEVEL 3

51

16%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

200

54%

LEVEL 2

95

26%

LEVEL 3

47

13%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

58

43%

LEVEL 2

47

35%

LEVEL 3

23

17%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

72

47%

LEVEL 2

42

27%

LEVEL 3

27

18%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

105

60%

LEVEL 2

38

22%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

128

59%

LEVEL 2

53

25%

LEVEL 3

20

9%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

16

62%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

35
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

56

46%

LEVEL 2

32

26%

LEVEL 3

31

25%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

37
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

62

47%

LEVEL 2

33

25%

LEVEL 3

26

20%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

42

63%

LEVEL 2

18

27%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

61

73%

LEVEL 2

18

22%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

52

53%

LEVEL 2

30

30%

LEVEL 3

14

14%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

53

46%

LEVEL 2

34

30%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

14

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

117

45%

LEVEL 2

79

30%

LEVEL 3

51

20%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

139

46%

LEVEL 2

90

30%

LEVEL 3

46

15%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

46

88%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

61

91%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

64
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

151

51%

LEVEL 2

84

28%

LEVEL 3

51

17%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

73
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

191

54%

LEVEL 2

93

26%

LEVEL 3

46

13%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

12

92%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

9

75%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

35

35%

LEVEL 2

29

29%

LEVEL 3

26

26%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

49

43%

LEVEL 2

28

24%

LEVEL 3

22

19%

LEVEL 4

16

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

128

60%

LEVEL 2

56

26%

LEVEL 3

25

12%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

151

59%

LEVEL 2

67

26%

LEVEL 3

25

10%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

63
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

155

52%

LEVEL 2

81

27%

LEVEL 3

50

17%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

72
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

183

54%

LEVEL 2

85

25%

LEVEL 3

45

13%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

8

62%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

17

59%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.