LONGWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 562

LEVEL 1

239

43%

LEVEL 2

143

25%

LEVEL 3

110

20%

LEVEL 4

70

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

208

42%

LEVEL 2

124

25%

LEVEL 3

83

17%

LEVEL 4

78

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

99

36%

LEVEL 2

69

25%

LEVEL 3

61

22%

LEVEL 4

45

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

96

39%

LEVEL 2

56

23%

LEVEL 3

44

18%

LEVEL 4

48

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

140

49%

LEVEL 2

74

26%

LEVEL 3

49

17%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

112

45%

LEVEL 2

68

27%

LEVEL 3

39

16%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

11

26%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

13

31%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

7

20%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

14

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

49

25%

LEVEL 2

62

31%

LEVEL 3

54

27%

LEVEL 4

32

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

72
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

61

34%

LEVEL 2

45

25%

LEVEL 3

31

17%

LEVEL 4

41

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

82

57%

LEVEL 2

32

22%

LEVEL 3

17

12%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

62

54%

LEVEL 2

28

25%

LEVEL 3

18

16%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

83

54%

LEVEL 2

37

24%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

68

49%

LEVEL 2

38

28%

LEVEL 3

16

12%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

162

35%

LEVEL 2

131

28%

LEVEL 3

108

23%

LEVEL 4

68

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

151

36%

LEVEL 2

119

28%

LEVEL 3

76

18%

LEVEL 4

76

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

77

83%

LEVEL 2

12

13%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

57

80%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

179
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

197

38%

LEVEL 2

137

27%

LEVEL 3

109

21%

LEVEL 4

70

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

161
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

175

39%

LEVEL 2

115

25%

LEVEL 3

83

18%

LEVEL 4

78

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

42

86%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

33

79%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

55

24%

LEVEL 2

75

33%

LEVEL 3

59

26%

LEVEL 4

40

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

59

27%

LEVEL 2

64

30%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

46

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

184

55%

LEVEL 2

68

20%

LEVEL 3

51

15%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

149

54%

LEVEL 2

60

22%

LEVEL 3

37

13%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

179
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 543

LEVEL 1

224

41%

LEVEL 2

140

26%

LEVEL 3

109

20%

LEVEL 4

70

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

158
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 479

LEVEL 1

198

41%

LEVEL 2

123

26%

LEVEL 3

82

17%

LEVEL 4

76

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

15

79%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

10

71%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.