Skip to Content
Main content

DAWNWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

113

39%

LEVEL 2

89

30%

LEVEL 3

60

20%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

79

33%

LEVEL 2

65

27%

LEVEL 3

53

22%

LEVEL 4

44

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

40

33%

LEVEL 2

38

31%

LEVEL 3

27

22%

LEVEL 4

18

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

35

33%

LEVEL 2

20

19%

LEVEL 3

25

24%

LEVEL 4

25

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

73

43%

LEVEL 2

51

30%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

44

32%

LEVEL 2

45

33%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

12

22%

LEVEL 2

14

26%

LEVEL 3

19

35%

LEVEL 4

9

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

10

19%

LEVEL 2

16

30%

LEVEL 3

14

26%

LEVEL 4

14

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

43
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

40

29%

LEVEL 2

53

39%

LEVEL 3

27

20%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

44
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

35

32%

LEVEL 2

31

28%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

21

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

57

68%

LEVEL 2

15

18%

LEVEL 3

10

12%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

28

50%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

70

29%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

56

27%

LEVEL 2

56

27%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

44

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

43

86%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

23

72%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

90
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

67

27%

LEVEL 2

87

36%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

97
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

55

26%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

44

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

46

94%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

24

86%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

31

22%

LEVEL 2

49

35%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

22

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

29

22%

LEVEL 2

35

27%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

28

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

82

54%

LEVEL 2

40

26%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

50

45%

LEVEL 2

30

27%

LEVEL 3

15

14%

LEVEL 4

16

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.