MT SINAI UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

50

12%

LEVEL 2

131

33%

LEVEL 3

152

38%

LEVEL 4

70

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

238
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

53

13%

LEVEL 2

126

30%

LEVEL 3

165

40%

LEVEL 4

73

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

81

40%

LEVEL 4

42

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

55

28%

LEVEL 3

82

42%

LEVEL 4

39

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

29

14%

LEVEL 2

73

36%

LEVEL 3

71

35%

LEVEL 4

28

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

117
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

32

15%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

83

38%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

44
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

10

18%

LEVEL 3

29

52%

LEVEL 4

15

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

42
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

27

46%

LEVEL 4

15

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

155
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

42

14%

LEVEL 2

102

34%

LEVEL 3

108

36%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

173
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

47

15%

LEVEL 2

93

30%

LEVEL 3

121

39%

LEVEL 4

52

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

17

46%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

4

12%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

13

39%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

117

32%

LEVEL 3

148

40%

LEVEL 4

68

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

107

29%

LEVEL 3

159

43%

LEVEL 4

72

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

17

46%

LEVEL 2

14

38%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

20

43%

LEVEL 2

19

41%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

204
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

42

12%

LEVEL 2

116

32%

LEVEL 3

138

38%

LEVEL 4

66

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

214
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

43

12%

LEVEL 2

113

31%

LEVEL 3

149

40%

LEVEL 4

65

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

8

20%

LEVEL 2

15

37%

LEVEL 3

14

34%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

10

21%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

16

34%

LEVEL 4

8

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.