THREE VILLAGE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

656
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 937

LEVEL 1

56

6%

LEVEL 2

225

24%

LEVEL 3

413

44%

LEVEL 4

243

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

674
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 938

LEVEL 1

56

6%

LEVEL 2

208

22%

LEVEL 3

372

40%

LEVEL 4

302

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

362
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

15

3%

LEVEL 2

88

19%

LEVEL 3

206

44%

LEVEL 4

156

34%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

367
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

23

5%

LEVEL 2

92

19%

LEVEL 3

189

39%

LEVEL 4

178

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

294
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

41

9%

LEVEL 2

137

29%

LEVEL 3

207

44%

LEVEL 4

87

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

307
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

33

7%

LEVEL 2

116

25%

LEVEL 3

183

40%

LEVEL 4

124

27%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

15

50%

LEVEL 4

6

20%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

32
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

18

47%

LEVEL 4

14

37%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

192
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

36

15%

LEVEL 3

99

42%

LEVEL 4

93

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

187
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

43

18%

LEVEL 3

90

37%

LEVEL 4

97

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

403
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 602

LEVEL 1

43

7%

LEVEL 2

156

26%

LEVEL 3

275

46%

LEVEL 4

128

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

405
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 568

LEVEL 1

30

5%

LEVEL 2

133

23%

LEVEL 3

237

42%

LEVEL 4

168

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

20

33%

LEVEL 3

22

37%

LEVEL 4

12

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

11

16%

LEVEL 2

14

20%

LEVEL 3

26

37%

LEVEL 4

19

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

640
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 870

LEVEL 1

37

4%

LEVEL 2

193

22%

LEVEL 3

402

46%

LEVEL 4

238

27%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

652
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 872

LEVEL 1

35

4%

LEVEL 2

185

21%

LEVEL 3

354

41%

LEVEL 4

298

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

19

28%

LEVEL 2

32

48%

LEVEL 3

11

16%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

21

32%

LEVEL 2

23

35%

LEVEL 3

18

27%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

672
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 930

LEVEL 1

51

5%

LEVEL 2

207

22%

LEVEL 3

370

40%

LEVEL 4

302

32%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

622
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 880

LEVEL 1

48

5%

LEVEL 2

210

24%

LEVEL 3

386

44%

LEVEL 4

236

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

627
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 857

LEVEL 1

41

5%

LEVEL 2

189

22%

LEVEL 3

342

40%

LEVEL 4

285

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

8

14%

LEVEL 2

15

26%

LEVEL 3

27

47%

LEVEL 4

7

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

15

19%

LEVEL 2

19

23%

LEVEL 3

30

37%

LEVEL 4

17

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.