Skip to Content
Main content

MARTIN LUTHER KING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

95

23%

LEVEL 2

205

49%

LEVEL 3

95

23%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 606

LEVEL 1

239

39%

LEVEL 2

219

36%

LEVEL 3

126

21%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

47

22%

LEVEL 2

102

48%

LEVEL 3

48

23%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

118

39%

LEVEL 2

105

35%

LEVEL 3

62

21%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

48

24%

LEVEL 2

103

50%

LEVEL 3

47

23%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

121

40%

LEVEL 2

114

38%

LEVEL 3

64

21%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

49
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

37

21%

LEVEL 2

92

52%

LEVEL 3

43

24%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

53
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

105

41%

LEVEL 2

101

39%

LEVEL 3

46

18%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

67
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

55

24%

LEVEL 2

106

46%

LEVEL 3

52

23%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

93
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

126

38%

LEVEL 2

117

35%

LEVEL 3

78

23%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

74

21%

LEVEL 2

168

47%

LEVEL 3

91

26%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

186

36%

LEVEL 2

200

38%

LEVEL 3

113

22%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

21

34%

LEVEL 2

37

60%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

53

62%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

13

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

91
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

44

16%

LEVEL 2

136

50%

LEVEL 3

71

26%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

117
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

144

35%

LEVEL 2

145

36%

LEVEL 3

98

24%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

25
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

51

35%

LEVEL 2

69

48%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

31
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

95

48%

LEVEL 2

74

37%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

11

52%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

18

36%

LEVEL 2

22

44%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

90

23%

LEVEL 2

194

49%

LEVEL 3

90

23%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

138
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

221

40%

LEVEL 2

197

35%

LEVEL 3

118

21%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

111
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

86

22%

LEVEL 2

195

50%

LEVEL 3

90

23%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

138
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 552

LEVEL 1

220

40%

LEVEL 2

194

35%

LEVEL 3

117

21%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

9

38%

LEVEL 2

10

42%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

19

35%

LEVEL 2

25

46%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.