Skip to Content
Main content

BATH CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

138

32%

LEVEL 2

167

39%

LEVEL 3

94

22%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

204

37%

LEVEL 2

211

38%

LEVEL 3

105

19%

LEVEL 4

31

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

61

26%

LEVEL 2

103

44%

LEVEL 3

52

22%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

88

30%

LEVEL 2

119

41%

LEVEL 3

64

22%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

77

40%

LEVEL 2

64

33%

LEVEL 3

42

22%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

116

45%

LEVEL 2

92

35%

LEVEL 3

41

16%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

134

32%

LEVEL 2

158

38%

LEVEL 3

94

23%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

135
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 532

LEVEL 1

195

37%

LEVEL 2

202

38%

LEVEL 3

104

20%

LEVEL 4

31

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

93

25%

LEVEL 2

153

42%

LEVEL 3

90

25%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

137

29%

LEVEL 2

198

42%

LEVEL 3

104

22%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

45

71%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

67

83%

LEVEL 2

13

16%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

29

18%

LEVEL 2

62

39%

LEVEL 3

48

30%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

54

24%

LEVEL 2

93

42%

LEVEL 3

56

25%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

109

40%

LEVEL 2

105

39%

LEVEL 3

46

17%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

150

45%

LEVEL 2

118

36%

LEVEL 3

49

15%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

123
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

132

32%

LEVEL 2

163

39%

LEVEL 3

93

22%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

134
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

194

36%

LEVEL 2

205

38%

LEVEL 3

103

19%

LEVEL 4

31

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

10

56%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.