Skip to Content
Main content

ROMULUS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

47

26%

LEVEL 2

72

40%

LEVEL 3

49

28%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

54

29%

LEVEL 2

63

33%

LEVEL 3

55

29%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

17

20%

LEVEL 2

37

44%

LEVEL 3

25

30%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

19

22%

LEVEL 2

26

30%

LEVEL 3

33

38%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

30

32%

LEVEL 2

35

37%

LEVEL 3

24

26%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

35

34%

LEVEL 2

37

36%

LEVEL 3

22

22%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

5

28%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

48
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

40

26%

LEVEL 2

65

42%

LEVEL 3

39

25%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

62
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

47

29%

LEVEL 2

53

33%

LEVEL 3

47

29%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

32

21%

LEVEL 2

62

41%

LEVEL 3

48

32%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

36

22%

LEVEL 2

56

35%

LEVEL 3

53

33%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

15

58%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

18

67%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

15

24%

LEVEL 2

22

35%

LEVEL 3

19

30%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

17

25%

LEVEL 2

20

30%

LEVEL 3

23

34%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

32

28%

LEVEL 2

50

43%

LEVEL 3

30

26%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

37

30%

LEVEL 2

43

35%

LEVEL 3

32

26%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

70
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

51

28%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

54

29%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.