WATKINS GLEN CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

192
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

99

22%

LEVEL 2

162

36%

LEVEL 3

138

30%

LEVEL 4

54

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

117

25%

LEVEL 2

169

36%

LEVEL 3

106

23%

LEVEL 4

76

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

30

14%

LEVEL 2

79

38%

LEVEL 3

73

35%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

102
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

38

18%

LEVEL 2

77

35%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

45

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

69

28%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

65

27%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

79

31%

LEVEL 2

92

37%

LEVEL 3

49

20%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

10

50%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

8

31%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

9

35%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

171
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

92

23%

LEVEL 2

142

35%

LEVEL 3

127

31%

LEVEL 4

44

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

156
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

103

25%

LEVEL 2

158

38%

LEVEL 3

90

22%

LEVEL 4

66

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

6

32%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

52

14%

LEVEL 2

137

36%

LEVEL 3

134

36%

LEVEL 4

54

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

66

17%

LEVEL 2

149

38%

LEVEL 3

103

26%

LEVEL 4

76

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

47

62%

LEVEL 2

25

33%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

51

69%

LEVEL 2

20

27%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

27

13%

LEVEL 2

63

30%

LEVEL 3

86

41%

LEVEL 4

36

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

31

15%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

61

30%

LEVEL 4

48

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

72

30%

LEVEL 2

99

41%

LEVEL 3

52

22%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

86

32%

LEVEL 2

106

40%

LEVEL 3

45

17%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.