Skip to Content
Main content

COBLESKILL-RICHMONDVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 652

LEVEL 1

212

33%

LEVEL 2

234

36%

LEVEL 3

153

23%

LEVEL 4

53

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 628

LEVEL 1

227

36%

LEVEL 2

208

33%

LEVEL 3

136

22%

LEVEL 4

57

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

122
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

82

26%

LEVEL 2

110

35%

LEVEL 3

82

26%

LEVEL 4

40

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

116
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

91

30%

LEVEL 2

96

32%

LEVEL 3

79

26%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

130

38%

LEVEL 2

124

37%

LEVEL 3

71

21%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

136

42%

LEVEL 2

112

34%

LEVEL 3

57

18%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

190
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 596

LEVEL 1

193

32%

LEVEL 2

213

36%

LEVEL 3

140

23%

LEVEL 4

50

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

179
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 566

LEVEL 1

203

36%

LEVEL 2

184

33%

LEVEL 3

125

22%

LEVEL 4

54

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

13

37%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

8

23%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

18

45%

LEVEL 2

14

35%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 589

LEVEL 1

163

28%

LEVEL 2

221

38%

LEVEL 3

152

26%

LEVEL 4

53

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

192
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

173

31%

LEVEL 2

199

35%

LEVEL 3

135

24%

LEVEL 4

57

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

49

78%

LEVEL 2

13

21%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

54

84%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

121
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

59

20%

LEVEL 2

109

38%

LEVEL 3

87

30%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

67

24%

LEVEL 2

94

34%

LEVEL 3

81

29%

LEVEL 4

37

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

153

42%

LEVEL 2

125

34%

LEVEL 3

66

18%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

160

46%

LEVEL 2

114

33%

LEVEL 3

55

16%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

191
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 613

LEVEL 1

218

36%

LEVEL 2

204

33%

LEVEL 3

134

22%

LEVEL 4

57

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

9

60%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.