HAMILTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

89

43%

LEVEL 2

60

29%

LEVEL 3

48

23%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

99

46%

LEVEL 2

55

26%

LEVEL 3

48

22%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

45

40%

LEVEL 2

36

32%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

47

42%

LEVEL 2

31

28%

LEVEL 3

28

25%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

44

46%

LEVEL 2

24

25%

LEVEL 3

25

26%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

52

51%

LEVEL 2

24

24%

LEVEL 3

20

20%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

13

45%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

9

30%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

8

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

17

41%

LEVEL 2

13

32%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

12

30%

LEVEL 2

17

43%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

33

52%

LEVEL 2

18

29%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

32

52%

LEVEL 2

14

23%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

19

39%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

15

31%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

31

54%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

14

25%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

61

35%

LEVEL 2

56

32%

LEVEL 3

46

26%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

76

41%

LEVEL 2

51

28%

LEVEL 3

47

25%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

28

82%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

23

79%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

59
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

78

40%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

48

24%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

11

92%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

11

48%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

85

44%

LEVEL 2

55

28%

LEVEL 3

45

23%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

92

48%

LEVEL 2

50

26%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

53
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

81

42%

LEVEL 2

57

30%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

55
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

90

46%

LEVEL 2

49

25%

LEVEL 3

45

23%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.