Skip to Content
Main content

MONT PLEASANT MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 624

LEVEL 1

347

56%

LEVEL 2

196

31%

LEVEL 3

62

10%

LEVEL 4

19

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 623

LEVEL 1

387

62%

LEVEL 2

158

25%

LEVEL 3

54

9%

LEVEL 4

24

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

145

49%

LEVEL 2

105

36%

LEVEL 3

36

12%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

162

54%

LEVEL 2

90

30%

LEVEL 3

36

12%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

202

61%

LEVEL 2

91

28%

LEVEL 3

26

8%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

225

69%

LEVEL 2

68

21%

LEVEL 3

18

6%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

52

44%

LEVEL 2

42

36%

LEVEL 3

18

15%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

66

53%

LEVEL 2

37

30%

LEVEL 3

11

9%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

21
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

55

47%

LEVEL 2

41

35%

LEVEL 3

17

15%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

24
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

59

53%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

16

14%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

151

62%

LEVEL 2

68

28%

LEVEL 3

17

7%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

158

70%

LEVEL 2

56

25%

LEVEL 3

8

4%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

80

63%

LEVEL 2

38

30%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

89

64%

LEVEL 2

31

22%

LEVEL 3

18

13%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 518

LEVEL 1

261

50%

LEVEL 2

179

35%

LEVEL 3

59

11%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

284

56%

LEVEL 2

144

28%

LEVEL 3

54

11%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

86

81%

LEVEL 2

17

16%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

103

88%

LEVEL 2

14

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

81
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 592

LEVEL 1

321

54%

LEVEL 2

190

32%

LEVEL 3

62

10%

LEVEL 4

19

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

78
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 592

LEVEL 1

358

60%

LEVEL 2

156

26%

LEVEL 3

54

9%

LEVEL 4

24

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

26

81%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

29

94%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

35

48%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

17

23%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

114

54%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

23

11%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

312

57%

LEVEL 2

178

32%

LEVEL 3

45

8%

LEVEL 4

16

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

273

66%

LEVEL 2

96

23%

LEVEL 3

31

8%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

80
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 602

LEVEL 1

331

55%

LEVEL 2

191

32%

LEVEL 3

61

10%

LEVEL 4

19

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

77
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 591

LEVEL 1

364

62%

LEVEL 2

150

25%

LEVEL 3

53

9%

LEVEL 4

24

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

16

73%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

23

72%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.