Skip to Content
Main content

VAN CORLAER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

43
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

72

37%

LEVEL 2

79

41%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

87

41%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

45

21%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

28

27%

LEVEL 2

48

47%

LEVEL 3

20

19%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

34

31%

LEVEL 2

31

29%

LEVEL 3

28

26%

LEVEL 4

15

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

16
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

44

48%

LEVEL 2

31

34%

LEVEL 3

14

15%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

20
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

53

51%

LEVEL 2

30

29%

LEVEL 3

17

17%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

6

32%

LEVEL 2

9

47%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

8

30%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

8

30%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

20
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

24

35%

LEVEL 2

25

36%

LEVEL 3

15

22%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

24
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

20

32%

LEVEL 2

19

30%

LEVEL 3

15

24%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

22

52%

LEVEL 2

16

38%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

24

48%

LEVEL 2

16

32%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

18

38%

LEVEL 2

21

44%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

35

59%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

10

17%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

50

33%

LEVEL 2

60

39%

LEVEL 3

33

22%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

58

35%

LEVEL 2

53

32%

LEVEL 3

38

23%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

22

52%

LEVEL 2

19

45%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

29

66%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

12

38%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

5

15%

LEVEL 2

13

38%

LEVEL 3

11

32%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

60

37%

LEVEL 2

71

44%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

82

46%

LEVEL 2

48

27%

LEVEL 3

34

19%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

43
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

69

37%

LEVEL 2

76

40%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

63
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

79

40%

LEVEL 2

55

28%

LEVEL 3

45

23%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

8

57%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.