Skip to Content
Main content

DRAPER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

94

36%

LEVEL 2

95

36%

LEVEL 3

50

19%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

153

42%

LEVEL 2

100

27%

LEVEL 3

69

19%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

30

25%

LEVEL 2

47

39%

LEVEL 3

27

23%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

55

33%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

41

24%

LEVEL 4

25

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

64

45%

LEVEL 2

48

34%

LEVEL 3

23

16%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

98

50%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

16

67%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

8

62%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

55
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

73

36%

LEVEL 2

77

38%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

95
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

105

38%

LEVEL 2

74

27%

LEVEL 3

54

20%

LEVEL 4

41

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

11

58%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

19

56%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

71

30%

LEVEL 2

91

39%

LEVEL 3

50

21%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

117

36%

LEVEL 2

97

30%

LEVEL 3

66

20%

LEVEL 4

43

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

23

85%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

36

86%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

73
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

92

36%

LEVEL 2

92

36%

LEVEL 3

50

19%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

46

27%

LEVEL 2

68

40%

LEVEL 3

35

20%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

61

31%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

39

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

48

53%

LEVEL 2

27

30%

LEVEL 3

15

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

92

55%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.