ROTTERDAM-MOHONASEN CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 664

LEVEL 1

207

31%

LEVEL 2

233

35%

LEVEL 3

185

28%

LEVEL 4

39

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

295
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 827

LEVEL 1

269

33%

LEVEL 2

263

32%

LEVEL 3

223

27%

LEVEL 4

72

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

122
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

83

27%

LEVEL 2

108

35%

LEVEL 3

97

31%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

166
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

114

28%

LEVEL 2

121

30%

LEVEL 3

121

30%

LEVEL 4

45

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

124

35%

LEVEL 2

125

36%

LEVEL 3

88

25%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

155

36%

LEVEL 2

142

33%

LEVEL 3

102

24%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

16

52%

LEVEL 2

10

32%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

29

51%

LEVEL 2

17

30%

LEVEL 3

11

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

11

41%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

184
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

149

29%

LEVEL 2

186

36%

LEVEL 3

150

29%

LEVEL 4

34

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

249
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 626

LEVEL 1

186

30%

LEVEL 2

191

31%

LEVEL 3

182

29%

LEVEL 4

67

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

19

49%

LEVEL 2

14

36%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

21

36%

LEVEL 2

22

37%

LEVEL 3

14

24%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

31

41%

LEVEL 2

24

32%

LEVEL 3

16

21%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 583

LEVEL 1

143

25%

LEVEL 2

219

38%

LEVEL 3

182

31%

LEVEL 4

39

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

290
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 716

LEVEL 1

181

25%

LEVEL 2

245

34%

LEVEL 3

218

30%

LEVEL 4

72

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

64

79%

LEVEL 2

14

17%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

88

79%

LEVEL 2

18

16%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

222
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 650

LEVEL 1

201

31%

LEVEL 2

227

35%

LEVEL 3

183

28%

LEVEL 4

39

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

294
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 820

LEVEL 1

267

33%

LEVEL 2

259

32%

LEVEL 3

222

27%

LEVEL 4

72

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

166
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

92

23%

LEVEL 2

145

36%

LEVEL 3

130

32%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

211
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

101

22%

LEVEL 2

140

31%

LEVEL 3

153

34%

LEVEL 4

58

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

115

44%

LEVEL 2

88

34%

LEVEL 3

55

21%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

168

45%

LEVEL 2

123

33%

LEVEL 3

70

19%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

222
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 658

LEVEL 1

205

31%

LEVEL 2

231

35%

LEVEL 3

183

28%

LEVEL 4

39

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.