Skip to Content
Main content

SCHALMONT MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

103

25%

LEVEL 2

148

35%

LEVEL 3

115

28%

LEVEL 4

52

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

120

28%

LEVEL 2

138

33%

LEVEL 3

104

25%

LEVEL 4

61

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

31

16%

LEVEL 2

74

38%

LEVEL 3

59

30%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

42

21%

LEVEL 2

66

33%

LEVEL 3

61

31%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

72

32%

LEVEL 2

74

33%

LEVEL 3

56

25%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

78

35%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

43

19%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

146
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

80

23%

LEVEL 2

126

36%

LEVEL 3

98

28%

LEVEL 4

48

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

150
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

96

26%

LEVEL 2

123

33%

LEVEL 3

93

25%

LEVEL 4

57

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

11

39%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

12

52%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

66

18%

LEVEL 2

139

38%

LEVEL 3

113

31%

LEVEL 4

52

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

88

23%

LEVEL 2

133

35%

LEVEL 3

102

27%

LEVEL 4

59

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

37

77%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

32

78%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

53

17%

LEVEL 2

106

35%

LEVEL 3

99

32%

LEVEL 4

47

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

57

19%

LEVEL 2

94

32%

LEVEL 3

85

29%

LEVEL 4

58

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

50

44%

LEVEL 2

42

37%

LEVEL 3

16

14%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

63

49%

LEVEL 2

44

34%

LEVEL 3

19

15%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.