VAN ANTWERP MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

241
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

56

15%

LEVEL 2

87

23%

LEVEL 3

111

29%

LEVEL 4

130

34%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

291
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

61

14%

LEVEL 2

74

17%

LEVEL 3

127

30%

LEVEL 4

164

38%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

29

16%

LEVEL 3

56

31%

LEVEL 4

75

42%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

147
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

24

12%

LEVEL 2

26

13%

LEVEL 3

64

32%

LEVEL 4

83

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

37

18%

LEVEL 2

58

28%

LEVEL 3

55

27%

LEVEL 4

55

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

144
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

37

16%

LEVEL 2

48

21%

LEVEL 3

63

28%

LEVEL 4

81

35%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

6

30%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

47
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

19

27%

LEVEL 4

28

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

59
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

13

16%

LEVEL 2

11

13%

LEVEL 3

18

22%

LEVEL 4

41

49%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

171
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

59

22%

LEVEL 3

83

32%

LEVEL 4

88

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

203
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

51

18%

LEVEL 3

94

33%

LEVEL 4

109

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

7

28%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

6

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

6

32%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

6

43%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

238
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

35

10%

LEVEL 2

75

22%

LEVEL 3

109

31%

LEVEL 4

129

37%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

283
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

39

10%

LEVEL 2

62

16%

LEVEL 3

122

32%

LEVEL 4

161

42%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

21

58%

LEVEL 2

12

33%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

22

52%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

240
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

53

14%

LEVEL 2

85

22%

LEVEL 3

110

29%

LEVEL 4

130

34%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

224
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

42

13%

LEVEL 2

69

21%

LEVEL 3

100

30%

LEVEL 4

124

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

268
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

39

11%

LEVEL 2

60

16%

LEVEL 3

112

31%

LEVEL 4

156

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

14

29%

LEVEL 2

18

37%

LEVEL 3

11

22%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

22

37%

LEVEL 2

14

24%

LEVEL 3

15

25%

LEVEL 4

8

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.