SCOTIA-GLENVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

410
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 845

LEVEL 1

172

20%

LEVEL 2

263

31%

LEVEL 3

264

31%

LEVEL 4

146

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

417
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 863

LEVEL 1

191

22%

LEVEL 2

255

30%

LEVEL 3

264

31%

LEVEL 4

153

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

223
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

59

15%

LEVEL 2

111

28%

LEVEL 3

143

36%

LEVEL 4

80

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

222
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

72

18%

LEVEL 2

110

27%

LEVEL 3

143

35%

LEVEL 4

79

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

187
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

113

25%

LEVEL 2

152

34%

LEVEL 3

121

27%

LEVEL 4

66

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

195
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

119

26%

LEVEL 2

145

32%

LEVEL 3

121

26%

LEVEL 4

74

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

386
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 758

LEVEL 1

134

18%

LEVEL 2

238

31%

LEVEL 3

247

33%

LEVEL 4

139

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

388
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 783

LEVEL 1

158

20%

LEVEL 2

237

30%

LEVEL 3

241

31%

LEVEL 4

147

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

20

56%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

7

29%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

11

46%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

13

39%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

20

54%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

398
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 734

LEVEL 1

101

14%

LEVEL 2

235

32%

LEVEL 3

254

35%

LEVEL 4

144

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

409
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 753

LEVEL 1

115

15%

LEVEL 2

229

30%

LEVEL 3

257

34%

LEVEL 4

152

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

71

64%

LEVEL 2

28

25%

LEVEL 3

10

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

76

69%

LEVEL 2

26

24%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

340
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 592

LEVEL 1

76

13%

LEVEL 2

176

30%

LEVEL 3

209

35%

LEVEL 4

131

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

334
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 604

LEVEL 1

93

15%

LEVEL 2

177

29%

LEVEL 3

196

32%

LEVEL 4

138

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

96

38%

LEVEL 2

87

34%

LEVEL 3

55

22%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

98

38%

LEVEL 2

78

30%

LEVEL 3

68

26%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

408
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 840

LEVEL 1

170

20%

LEVEL 2

262

31%

LEVEL 3

262

31%

LEVEL 4

146

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.