STILLWATER CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

65

16%

LEVEL 2

136

33%

LEVEL 3

156

38%

LEVEL 4

59

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

74

18%

LEVEL 2

129

31%

LEVEL 3

143

34%

LEVEL 4

74

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

54

26%

LEVEL 3

91

45%

LEVEL 4

40

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

125
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

25

12%

LEVEL 2

52

26%

LEVEL 3

79

39%

LEVEL 4

46

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

46

22%

LEVEL 2

82

39%

LEVEL 3

65

31%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

49

22%

LEVEL 2

77

35%

LEVEL 3

64

29%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

205
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

61

15%

LEVEL 2

128

32%

LEVEL 3

148

38%

LEVEL 4

57

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

204
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

70

18%

LEVEL 2

124

31%

LEVEL 3

135

34%

LEVEL 4

69

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

209
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

41

11%

LEVEL 2

113

31%

LEVEL 3

151

42%

LEVEL 4

58

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

51

14%

LEVEL 2

109

30%

LEVEL 3

134

37%

LEVEL 4

73

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

24

45%

LEVEL 2

23

43%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

23

43%

LEVEL 2

20

38%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

177
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

29

10%

LEVEL 2

79

28%

LEVEL 3

122

43%

LEVEL 4

55

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

161
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

37

13%

LEVEL 2

83

30%

LEVEL 3

102

36%

LEVEL 4

59

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

36

27%

LEVEL 2

57

44%

LEVEL 3

34

26%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

37

27%

LEVEL 2

46

33%

LEVEL 3

41

29%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

214
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

61

15%

LEVEL 2

131

32%

LEVEL 3

155

38%

LEVEL 4

59

15%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

216
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

72

17%

LEVEL 2

124

30%

LEVEL 3

143

35%

LEVEL 4

73

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.