Skip to Content
Main content

HARRISON AVENUE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

28

19%

LEVEL 2

54

37%

LEVEL 3

46

32%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

25

19%

LEVEL 2

49

36%

LEVEL 3

46

34%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

15

19%

LEVEL 2

29

36%

LEVEL 3

28

35%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

15

20%

LEVEL 2

27

36%

LEVEL 3

22

30%

LEVEL 4

10

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

13

20%

LEVEL 2

25

39%

LEVEL 3

18

28%

LEVEL 4

8

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

10

16%

LEVEL 2

22

36%

LEVEL 3

24

39%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

58
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

22

17%

LEVEL 2

50

38%

LEVEL 3

42

32%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

56
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

23

19%

LEVEL 2

43

35%

LEVEL 3

41

34%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

25

18%

LEVEL 2

49

36%

LEVEL 3

46

34%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

21

17%

LEVEL 2

45

35%

LEVEL 3

46

36%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

8

13%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

26

43%

LEVEL 4

11

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

7

12%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

25

42%

LEVEL 4

12

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

20

24%

LEVEL 2

38

45%

LEVEL 3

20

24%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

18

24%

LEVEL 2

34

45%

LEVEL 3

21

28%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

60
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

24

18%

LEVEL 2

46

35%

LEVEL 3

46

35%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.