GORDON CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

48

19%

LEVEL 2

73

29%

LEVEL 3

90

36%

LEVEL 4

42

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

52

23%

LEVEL 2

72

31%

LEVEL 3

79

34%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

21

18%

LEVEL 2

36

30%

LEVEL 3

40

33%

LEVEL 4

23

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

26

23%

LEVEL 2

27

24%

LEVEL 3

40

35%

LEVEL 4

21

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

27

20%

LEVEL 2

37

28%

LEVEL 3

50

38%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

26

22%

LEVEL 2

45

38%

LEVEL 3

39

33%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

44

19%

LEVEL 2

67

29%

LEVEL 3

86

37%

LEVEL 4

38

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

101
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

47

22%

LEVEL 2

66

31%

LEVEL 3

74

35%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

60

29%

LEVEL 3

84

40%

LEVEL 4

42

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

60

33%

LEVEL 3

78

43%

LEVEL 4

27

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

26

58%

LEVEL 2

13

29%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

34

71%

LEVEL 2

12

25%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

47

27%

LEVEL 3

70

41%

LEVEL 4

36

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

25

16%

LEVEL 2

45

28%

LEVEL 3

64

41%

LEVEL 4

24

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

29

36%

LEVEL 2

26

32%

LEVEL 3

20

25%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

27

37%

LEVEL 2

27

37%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

131
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

45

18%

LEVEL 2

72

29%

LEVEL 3

89

36%

LEVEL 4

42

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

106
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

50

22%

LEVEL 2

70

31%

LEVEL 3

78

35%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.