MECHANICVILLE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

140

25%

LEVEL 2

178

32%

LEVEL 3

168

30%

LEVEL 4

65

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

247
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 553

LEVEL 1

146

26%

LEVEL 2

160

29%

LEVEL 3

167

30%

LEVEL 4

80

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

129
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

39

16%

LEVEL 2

78

32%

LEVEL 3

81

33%

LEVEL 4

48

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

51

20%

LEVEL 2

62

25%

LEVEL 3

85

34%

LEVEL 4

55

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

101

33%

LEVEL 2

100

33%

LEVEL 3

87

29%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

95

32%

LEVEL 2

98

33%

LEVEL 3

82

27%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

8

40%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

6

60%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

215
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

132

26%

LEVEL 2

163

32%

LEVEL 3

155

30%

LEVEL 4

60

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

223
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

130

26%

LEVEL 2

146

29%

LEVEL 3

147

29%

LEVEL 4

76

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

90

20%

LEVEL 2

145

32%

LEVEL 3

160

35%

LEVEL 4

65

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

240
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

90

20%

LEVEL 2

129

28%

LEVEL 3

160

35%

LEVEL 4

80

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

50

55%

LEVEL 2

33

36%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

56

60%

LEVEL 2

31

33%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

171
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

73

21%

LEVEL 2

104

30%

LEVEL 3

123

35%

LEVEL 4

48

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

180
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

67

20%

LEVEL 2

92

27%

LEVEL 3

112

33%

LEVEL 4

68

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

67

33%

LEVEL 2

74

36%

LEVEL 3

45

22%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

79

37%

LEVEL 2

68

32%

LEVEL 3

55

26%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

244
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

146

27%

LEVEL 2

157

29%

LEVEL 3

165

30%

LEVEL 4

79

14%

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

231
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 545

LEVEL 1

137

25%

LEVEL 2

177

32%

LEVEL 3

166

30%

LEVEL 4

65

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.