Skip to Content
Main content

MECHANICVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

54

17%

LEVEL 2

104

33%

LEVEL 3

118

37%

LEVEL 4

43

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

50

17%

LEVEL 2

83

28%

LEVEL 3

121

40%

LEVEL 4

46

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

20

13%

LEVEL 2

46

30%

LEVEL 3

54

35%

LEVEL 4

33

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

21

15%

LEVEL 2

33

23%

LEVEL 3

60

42%

LEVEL 4

29

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

34

20%

LEVEL 2

58

35%

LEVEL 3

64

39%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

29

18%

LEVEL 2

50

32%

LEVEL 3

61

39%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

7

47%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

51

17%

LEVEL 2

93

32%

LEVEL 3

109

37%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

152
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

42

16%

LEVEL 2

73

27%

LEVEL 3

108

40%

LEVEL 4

44

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

82

30%

LEVEL 3

114

42%

LEVEL 4

43

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

62

25%

LEVEL 3

115

46%

LEVEL 4

46

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

24

48%

LEVEL 2

22

44%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

22

45%

LEVEL 2

21

43%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

83

43%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

22

13%

LEVEL 2

39

22%

LEVEL 3

77

44%

LEVEL 4

37

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

31

25%

LEVEL 2

45

36%

LEVEL 3

35

28%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

28

22%

LEVEL 2

44

35%

LEVEL 3

44

35%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.