GOWANA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

359
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

56

10%

LEVEL 2

136

25%

LEVEL 3

178

32%

LEVEL 4

181

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

356
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

41

8%

LEVEL 2

115

22%

LEVEL 3

141

28%

LEVEL 4

215

42%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

198
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

65

23%

LEVEL 3

89

31%

LEVEL 4

109

38%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

193
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

46

18%

LEVEL 3

73

29%

LEVEL 4

120

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

161
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

34

13%

LEVEL 2

71

27%

LEVEL 3

89

33%

LEVEL 4

72

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

163
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

69

27%

LEVEL 3

68

26%

LEVEL 4

95

37%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

11

44%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

13

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

46
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

17

32%

LEVEL 4

29

55%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

40
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

15

31%

LEVEL 4

25

51%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

274
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

48

11%

LEVEL 2

115

26%

LEVEL 3

140

32%

LEVEL 4

134

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

277
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

35

9%

LEVEL 2

89

22%

LEVEL 3

112

28%

LEVEL 4

165

41%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

7

54%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

4

31%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

10

43%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

8

35%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

342
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

39

8%

LEVEL 2

113

23%

LEVEL 3

165

33%

LEVEL 4

177

36%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

346
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

27

6%

LEVEL 2

101

21%

LEVEL 3

133

28%

LEVEL 4

213

45%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

17

30%

LEVEL 2

23

40%

LEVEL 3

13

23%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

14

37%

LEVEL 2

14

37%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

327
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 480

LEVEL 1

43

9%

LEVEL 2

110

23%

LEVEL 3

162

34%

LEVEL 4

165

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

323
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

32

7%

LEVEL 2

89

20%

LEVEL 3

120

27%

LEVEL 4

203

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

13

18%

LEVEL 2

26

37%

LEVEL 3

16

23%

LEVEL 4

16

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

9

13%

LEVEL 2

26

38%

LEVEL 3

21

31%

LEVEL 4

12

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.