Skip to Content
Main content

CHANGO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

44

19%

LEVEL 3

112

49%

LEVEL 4

63

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

58

22%

LEVEL 3

113

42%

LEVEL 4

85

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

9

8%

LEVEL 3

56

51%

LEVEL 4

36

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

23

19%

LEVEL 3

49

42%

LEVEL 4

40

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

35

29%

LEVEL 3

56

46%

LEVEL 4

27

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

35

23%

LEVEL 3

64

43%

LEVEL 4

45

30%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

7

64%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

10

53%

LEVEL 4

5

26%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

11

61%

LEVEL 4

6

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

9

41%

LEVEL 4

11

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

143
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

38

20%

LEVEL 3

90

48%

LEVEL 4

53

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

156
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

49

23%

LEVEL 3

88

41%

LEVEL 4

68

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

40

18%

LEVEL 3

109

50%

LEVEL 4

62

29%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

192
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

48

19%

LEVEL 3

108

44%

LEVEL 4

84

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

4

20%

LEVEL 2

10

50%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

196
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

55

21%

LEVEL 3

111

42%

LEVEL 4

85

32%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

158
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

35

18%

LEVEL 3

100

50%

LEVEL 4

58

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

177
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

49

21%

LEVEL 3

102

43%

LEVEL 4

75

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

12

40%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

11

34%

LEVEL 4

10

31%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.