RICHARD H O'ROURKE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

346
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 594

LEVEL 1

71

12%

LEVEL 2

177

30%

LEVEL 3

181

30%

LEVEL 4

165

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

408
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 627

LEVEL 1

73

12%

LEVEL 2

146

23%

LEVEL 3

189

30%

LEVEL 4

219

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

197
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

78

26%

LEVEL 3

99

33%

LEVEL 4

98

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

241
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

29

9%

LEVEL 2

66

20%

LEVEL 3

108

32%

LEVEL 4

133

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

149
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

44

15%

LEVEL 2

99

34%

LEVEL 3

82

28%

LEVEL 4

67

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

167
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

44

15%

LEVEL 2

80

27%

LEVEL 3

81

28%

LEVEL 4

86

30%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

6

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

5

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

323
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

65

12%

LEVEL 2

163

30%

LEVEL 3

166

30%

LEVEL 4

157

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

376
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 576

LEVEL 1

67

12%

LEVEL 2

133

23%

LEVEL 3

176

31%

LEVEL 4

200

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

7

58%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

331
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 528

LEVEL 1

46

9%

LEVEL 2

151

29%

LEVEL 3

169

32%

LEVEL 4

162

31%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

392
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 545

LEVEL 1

41

8%

LEVEL 2

112

21%

LEVEL 3

178

33%

LEVEL 4

214

39%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

25

38%

LEVEL 2

26

39%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

32

39%

LEVEL 2

34

41%

LEVEL 3

11

13%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

298
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

54

11%

LEVEL 2

142

29%

LEVEL 3

154

31%

LEVEL 4

144

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

358
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

47

9%

LEVEL 2

114

22%

LEVEL 3

160

31%

LEVEL 4

198

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

17

17%

LEVEL 2

35

35%

LEVEL 3

27

27%

LEVEL 4

21

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

26

24%

LEVEL 2

32

30%

LEVEL 3

29

27%

LEVEL 4

21

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.