A A KINGSTON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

91

25%

LEVEL 2

115

32%

LEVEL 3

85

24%

LEVEL 4

68

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

107

31%

LEVEL 2

85

24%

LEVEL 3

71

20%

LEVEL 4

87

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

30

19%

LEVEL 2

42

27%

LEVEL 3

43

27%

LEVEL 4

43

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

38

25%

LEVEL 2

37

24%

LEVEL 3

33

22%

LEVEL 4

44

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

61

30%

LEVEL 2

73

36%

LEVEL 3

42

21%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

69

35%

LEVEL 2

48

24%

LEVEL 3

38

19%

LEVEL 4

43

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

6

60%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

139
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

87

26%

LEVEL 2

106

32%

LEVEL 3

74

22%

LEVEL 4

65

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

145
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

99

31%

LEVEL 2

79

24%

LEVEL 3

63

20%

LEVEL 4

82

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

53

17%

LEVEL 2

106

34%

LEVEL 3

82

27%

LEVEL 4

68

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

66

22%

LEVEL 2

78

26%

LEVEL 3

70

23%

LEVEL 4

85

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

38

76%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

41

80%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

156
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

105

30%

LEVEL 2

84

24%

LEVEL 3

70

20%

LEVEL 4

86

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

34

16%

LEVEL 2

65

30%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

62

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

45

21%

LEVEL 2

46

21%

LEVEL 3

51

24%

LEVEL 4

73

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

57

39%

LEVEL 2

50

34%

LEVEL 3

32

22%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

62

46%

LEVEL 2

39

29%

LEVEL 3

20

15%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

152
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

88

25%

LEVEL 2

112

32%

LEVEL 3

84

24%

LEVEL 4

68

19%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

156
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

105

31%

LEVEL 2

82

24%

LEVEL 3

70

20%

LEVEL 4

86

25%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.