MASSENA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

409
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,148

LEVEL 1

315

27%

LEVEL 2

424

37%

LEVEL 3

313

27%

LEVEL 4

96

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

441
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,089

LEVEL 1

254

23%

LEVEL 2

394

36%

LEVEL 3

328

30%

LEVEL 4

113

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

227
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 582

LEVEL 1

127

22%

LEVEL 2

228

39%

LEVEL 3

167

29%

LEVEL 4

60

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

231
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

108

20%

LEVEL 2

208

38%

LEVEL 3

161

29%

LEVEL 4

70

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

182
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 566

LEVEL 1

188

33%

LEVEL 2

196

35%

LEVEL 3

146

26%

LEVEL 4

36

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

210
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 542

LEVEL 1

146

27%

LEVEL 2

186

34%

LEVEL 3

167

31%

LEVEL 4

43

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

25
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

28

28%

LEVEL 2

48

48%

LEVEL 3

21

21%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

30
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

35

34%

LEVEL 2

38

37%

LEVEL 3

23

22%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

364
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 992

LEVEL 1

268

27%

LEVEL 2

360

36%

LEVEL 3

274

28%

LEVEL 4

90

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

394
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 936

LEVEL 1

209

22%

LEVEL 2

333

36%

LEVEL 3

291

31%

LEVEL 4

103

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

9

41%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

9

53%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

6

29%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

8

36%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

382
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 916

LEVEL 1

174

19%

LEVEL 2

360

39%

LEVEL 3

287

31%

LEVEL 4

95

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

415
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 869

LEVEL 1

141

16%

LEVEL 2

313

36%

LEVEL 3

302

35%

LEVEL 4

113

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

141

61%

LEVEL 2

64

28%

LEVEL 3

26

11%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

113

51%

LEVEL 2

81

37%

LEVEL 3

26

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

206
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

66

16%

LEVEL 2

150

36%

LEVEL 3

145

34%

LEVEL 4

61

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

217
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

56

14%

LEVEL 2

123

31%

LEVEL 3

150

38%

LEVEL 4

67

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

203
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 726

LEVEL 1

249

34%

LEVEL 2

274

38%

LEVEL 3

168

23%

LEVEL 4

35

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

224
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 693

LEVEL 1

198

29%

LEVEL 2

271

39%

LEVEL 3

178

26%

LEVEL 4

46

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

408
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,142

LEVEL 1

311

27%

LEVEL 2

423

37%

LEVEL 3

312

27%

LEVEL 4

96

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

441
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,081

LEVEL 1

252

23%

LEVEL 2

388

36%

LEVEL 3

328

30%

LEVEL 4

113

10%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

6

75%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

404
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,130

LEVEL 1

308

27%

LEVEL 2

418

37%

LEVEL 3

309

27%

LEVEL 4

95

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

440
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,080

LEVEL 1

251

23%

LEVEL 2

389

36%

LEVEL 3

327

30%

LEVEL 4

113

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.