J M MCKENNEY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

60

21%

LEVEL 2

91

32%

LEVEL 3

90

32%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

75

25%

LEVEL 2

101

34%

LEVEL 3

72

24%

LEVEL 4

53

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

27

20%

LEVEL 2

37

28%

LEVEL 3

44

33%

LEVEL 4

26

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

28

20%

LEVEL 2

47

34%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

25

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

33

22%

LEVEL 2

54

36%

LEVEL 3

46

31%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

47

29%

LEVEL 2

54

33%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

60

22%

LEVEL 2

86

32%

LEVEL 3

84

31%

LEVEL 4

39

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

113
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

73

26%

LEVEL 2

98

35%

LEVEL 3

65

23%

LEVEL 4

48

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

36

15%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

86

35%

LEVEL 4

42

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

38

15%

LEVEL 2

93

37%

LEVEL 3

70

28%

LEVEL 4

51

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

24

67%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

37

76%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

62

37%

LEVEL 4

34

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

17

11%

LEVEL 2

49

31%

LEVEL 3

48

30%

LEVEL 4

46

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

45

38%

LEVEL 2

36

31%

LEVEL 3

28

24%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

58

41%

LEVEL 2

52

37%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

131
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

51

19%

LEVEL 2

90

33%

LEVEL 3

89

33%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

123
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

73

25%

LEVEL 2

100

34%

LEVEL 3

71

24%

LEVEL 4

52

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

9

82%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.