BRASHER FALLS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

122

30%

LEVEL 2

130

32%

LEVEL 3

107

27%

LEVEL 4

43

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

156

36%

LEVEL 2

134

31%

LEVEL 3

102

23%

LEVEL 4

43

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

39

20%

LEVEL 2

64

33%

LEVEL 3

63

32%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

70

32%

LEVEL 2

67

31%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

83

40%

LEVEL 2

66

32%

LEVEL 3

44

21%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

86

39%

LEVEL 2

67

31%

LEVEL 3

47

21%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

137
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

113

30%

LEVEL 2

124

33%

LEVEL 3

97

26%

LEVEL 4

40

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

136
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

149

36%

LEVEL 2

127

31%

LEVEL 3

97

24%

LEVEL 4

39

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

83

24%

LEVEL 2

115

33%

LEVEL 3

105

30%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

103

28%

LEVEL 2

119

33%

LEVEL 3

101

28%

LEVEL 4

42

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

39

70%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

53

76%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

32

19%

LEVEL 2

51

30%

LEVEL 3

63

37%

LEVEL 4

25

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

32

18%

LEVEL 2

52

30%

LEVEL 3

55

32%

LEVEL 4

35

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

90

39%

LEVEL 2

79

34%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

124

48%

LEVEL 2

82

31%

LEVEL 3

47

18%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

145
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

153

36%

LEVEL 2

132

31%

LEVEL 3

102

24%

LEVEL 4

43

10%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

141
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

110

29%

LEVEL 2

124

33%

LEVEL 3

102

27%

LEVEL 4

39

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

142
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

151

36%

LEVEL 2

130

31%

LEVEL 3

101

24%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

12

44%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.