Skip to Content
Main content

POMONA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

146

39%

LEVEL 2

155

41%

LEVEL 3

61

16%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

163

37%

LEVEL 2

179

41%

LEVEL 3

71

16%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

60

31%

LEVEL 2

79

41%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

72

33%

LEVEL 2

87

39%

LEVEL 3

44

20%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

86

46%

LEVEL 2

76

41%

LEVEL 3

17

9%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

91

42%

LEVEL 2

92

43%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

32

30%

LEVEL 2

45

42%

LEVEL 3

24

23%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

39

32%

LEVEL 2

53

44%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

108

43%

LEVEL 2

101

40%

LEVEL 3

32

13%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

56
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

118

40%

LEVEL 2

118

40%

LEVEL 3

45

15%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

89

31%

LEVEL 2

125

43%

LEVEL 3

60

21%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

95

29%

LEVEL 2

144

44%

LEVEL 3

69

21%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

57

65%

LEVEL 2

30

34%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

68

65%

LEVEL 2

35

33%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

78
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

65

24%

LEVEL 2

123

46%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

89
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

67

22%

LEVEL 2

155

50%

LEVEL 3

67

22%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

81

72%

LEVEL 2

32

28%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

96

77%

LEVEL 2

24

19%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

8

38%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

18

51%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

8

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

138

39%

LEVEL 2

146

41%

LEVEL 3

58

16%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

145

36%

LEVEL 2

170

42%

LEVEL 3

63

16%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

76
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

133

38%

LEVEL 2

142

40%

LEVEL 3

60

17%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

90
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

147

37%

LEVEL 2

165

41%

LEVEL 3

67

17%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

13

46%

LEVEL 2

13

46%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

16

47%

LEVEL 2

14

41%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.