PEARL RIVER UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

542
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 874

LEVEL 1

108

12%

LEVEL 2

224

26%

LEVEL 3

321

37%

LEVEL 4

221

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

599
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 913

LEVEL 1

102

11%

LEVEL 2

212

23%

LEVEL 3

328

36%

LEVEL 4

271

30%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

295
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

29

7%

LEVEL 2

90

22%

LEVEL 3

152

37%

LEVEL 4

143

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

327
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

25

6%

LEVEL 2

86

20%

LEVEL 3

166

38%

LEVEL 4

161

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

247
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

79

17%

LEVEL 2

134

29%

LEVEL 3

169

37%

LEVEL 4

78

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

272
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

77

16%

LEVEL 2

126

27%

LEVEL 3

162

34%

LEVEL 4

110

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

5

36%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

10

56%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

36
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

12

23%

LEVEL 3

20

38%

LEVEL 4

16

31%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

41
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

16

33%

LEVEL 4

25

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

448
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 671

LEVEL 1

64

10%

LEVEL 2

159

24%

LEVEL 3

262

39%

LEVEL 4

186

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

476
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 694

LEVEL 1

67

10%

LEVEL 2

151

22%

LEVEL 3

255

37%

LEVEL 4

221

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

32

26%

LEVEL 2

44

36%

LEVEL 3

33

27%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

67
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

28

20%

LEVEL 2

45

32%

LEVEL 3

46

33%

LEVEL 4

21

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

527
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 776

LEVEL 1

54

7%

LEVEL 2

195

25%

LEVEL 3

307

40%

LEVEL 4

220

28%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

581
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 806

LEVEL 1

48

6%

LEVEL 2

177

22%

LEVEL 3

313

39%

LEVEL 4

268

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

54

55%

LEVEL 2

29

30%

LEVEL 3

14

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

54

50%

LEVEL 2

35

33%

LEVEL 3

15

14%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

542
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 854

LEVEL 1

94

11%

LEVEL 2

218

26%

LEVEL 3

321

38%

LEVEL 4

221

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

595
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 886

LEVEL 1

93

10%

LEVEL 2

198

22%

LEVEL 3

324

37%

LEVEL 4

271

31%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

14

70%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

9

33%

LEVEL 2

14

52%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

509
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 758

LEVEL 1

74

10%

LEVEL 2

175

23%

LEVEL 3

304

40%

LEVEL 4

205

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

538
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 783

LEVEL 1

76

10%

LEVEL 2

169

22%

LEVEL 3

290

37%

LEVEL 4

248

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

34

29%

LEVEL 2

49

42%

LEVEL 3

17

15%

LEVEL 4

16

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

26

20%

LEVEL 2

43

33%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

23

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

536
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 861

LEVEL 1

106

12%

LEVEL 2

219

25%

LEVEL 3

320

37%

LEVEL 4

216

25%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

590
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 897

LEVEL 1

99

11%

LEVEL 2

208

23%

LEVEL 3

320

36%

LEVEL 4

270

30%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

5

38%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

8

50%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.