JAMES A FARLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

113

38%

LEVEL 2

114

38%

LEVEL 3

55

18%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

108

32%

LEVEL 2

104

31%

LEVEL 3

86

25%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

39

28%

LEVEL 2

52

38%

LEVEL 3

33

24%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

34

22%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

46

30%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

74

46%

LEVEL 2

62

38%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

74

40%

LEVEL 2

50

27%

LEVEL 3

40

22%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

38
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

20

22%

LEVEL 2

34

37%

LEVEL 3

28

30%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

52
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

22

20%

LEVEL 2

35

32%

LEVEL 3

30

28%

LEVEL 4

22

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

10

42%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

16

53%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

78

46%

LEVEL 2

65

39%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

59
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

67

37%

LEVEL 2

53

30%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

88

33%

LEVEL 2

106

40%

LEVEL 3

55

21%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

76

26%

LEVEL 2

96

32%

LEVEL 3

85

29%

LEVEL 4

41

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

25

76%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

32

78%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

73
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

80

31%

LEVEL 2

109

42%

LEVEL 3

55

21%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

125
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

72

25%

LEVEL 2

92

32%

LEVEL 3

84

29%

LEVEL 4

41

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

33

87%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

36

72%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

24

19%

LEVEL 2

51

40%

LEVEL 3

39

31%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

33

20%

LEVEL 2

47

29%

LEVEL 3

50

31%

LEVEL 4

32

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

89

51%

LEVEL 2

63

36%

LEVEL 3

16

9%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

75

42%

LEVEL 2

57

32%

LEVEL 3

36

20%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.