HOOSIC VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

82

24%

LEVEL 2

126

37%

LEVEL 3

90

26%

LEVEL 4

43

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

103

27%

LEVEL 2

124

32%

LEVEL 3

97

25%

LEVEL 4

63

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

27

16%

LEVEL 2

59

36%

LEVEL 3

49

30%

LEVEL 4

31

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

39

21%

LEVEL 2

51

27%

LEVEL 3

56

30%

LEVEL 4

41

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

55

31%

LEVEL 2

67

38%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

64

32%

LEVEL 2

73

37%

LEVEL 3

41

21%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

127
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

78

24%

LEVEL 2

121

37%

LEVEL 3

86

26%

LEVEL 4

41

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

154
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

94

26%

LEVEL 2

118

32%

LEVEL 3

95

26%

LEVEL 4

59

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

47

16%

LEVEL 2

112

39%

LEVEL 3

84

29%

LEVEL 4

43

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

62

20%

LEVEL 2

100

32%

LEVEL 3

92

29%

LEVEL 4

63

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

35

64%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

41

59%

LEVEL 2

24

34%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

38

17%

LEVEL 2

81

36%

LEVEL 3

72

32%

LEVEL 4

36

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

44

18%

LEVEL 2

77

32%

LEVEL 3

72

30%

LEVEL 4

48

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

44

39%

LEVEL 2

45

39%

LEVEL 3

18

16%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

59

40%

LEVEL 2

47

32%

LEVEL 3

25

17%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

156
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

103

27%

LEVEL 2

122

32%

LEVEL 3

94

25%

LEVEL 4

62

16%

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.