HOOSICK FALLS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

133

30%

LEVEL 2

158

35%

LEVEL 3

108

24%

LEVEL 4

47

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

138

30%

LEVEL 2

153

33%

LEVEL 3

119

26%

LEVEL 4

48

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

51

23%

LEVEL 2

74

34%

LEVEL 3

62

28%

LEVEL 4

33

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

55

25%

LEVEL 2

64

29%

LEVEL 3

65

30%

LEVEL 4

35

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

82

36%

LEVEL 2

84

37%

LEVEL 3

46

20%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

83

35%

LEVEL 2

89

37%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

147
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

122

29%

LEVEL 2

149

36%

LEVEL 3

102

24%

LEVEL 4

45

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

157
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

127

30%

LEVEL 2

141

33%

LEVEL 3

113

27%

LEVEL 4

44

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

104

27%

LEVEL 2

136

35%

LEVEL 3

104

27%

LEVEL 4

46

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

109

27%

LEVEL 2

140

34%

LEVEL 3

114

28%

LEVEL 4

48

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

29

52%

LEVEL 2

22

39%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

29

62%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

48

21%

LEVEL 2

86

37%

LEVEL 3

65

28%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

44

21%

LEVEL 2

65

31%

LEVEL 3

73

34%

LEVEL 4

31

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

85

40%

LEVEL 2

72

34%

LEVEL 3

43

20%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

94

38%

LEVEL 2

88

36%

LEVEL 3

46

19%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

154
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

126

29%

LEVEL 2

157

36%

LEVEL 3

107

24%

LEVEL 4

47

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

164
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

135

30%

LEVEL 2

148

33%

LEVEL 3

117

26%

LEVEL 4

47

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.