Skip to Content
Main content

RED MILL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

39

20%

LEVEL 3

87

45%

LEVEL 4

57

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

54

25%

LEVEL 3

88

42%

LEVEL 4

59

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

15

15%

LEVEL 3

43

43%

LEVEL 4

39

39%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

22

21%

LEVEL 3

46

43%

LEVEL 4

37

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

7

8%

LEVEL 2

24

26%

LEVEL 3

44

47%

LEVEL 4

18

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

9

9%

LEVEL 2

32

30%

LEVEL 3

42

40%

LEVEL 4

22

21%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

6

60%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

5

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

116
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

31

20%

LEVEL 3

69

45%

LEVEL 4

47

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

113
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

67

40%

LEVEL 4

46

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

34

19%

LEVEL 3

84

47%

LEVEL 4

56

31%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

51

25%

LEVEL 3

85

42%

LEVEL 4

58

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

22

16%

LEVEL 3

67

48%

LEVEL 4

48

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

31

22%

LEVEL 3

62

43%

LEVEL 4

48

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

17

33%

LEVEL 3

20

39%

LEVEL 4

9

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

8

12%

LEVEL 2

23

34%

LEVEL 3

26

38%

LEVEL 4

11

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

143
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

37

20%

LEVEL 3

86

46%

LEVEL 4

57

30%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.