HOWARD L GOFF SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

468
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 736

LEVEL 1

89

12%

LEVEL 2

179

24%

LEVEL 3

240

33%

LEVEL 4

228

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

492
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 809

LEVEL 1

107

13%

LEVEL 2

210

26%

LEVEL 3

229

28%

LEVEL 4

263

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

240
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

41

11%

LEVEL 2

80

22%

LEVEL 3

105

29%

LEVEL 4

135

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

265
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

42

10%

LEVEL 2

100

25%

LEVEL 3

104

26%

LEVEL 4

161

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

228
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

48

13%

LEVEL 2

99

26%

LEVEL 3

135

36%

LEVEL 4

93

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

227
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

65

16%

LEVEL 2

110

27%

LEVEL 3

125

31%

LEVEL 4

102

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

23
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

14

44%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

22
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

15

41%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

20

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

41
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

14

26%

LEVEL 4

27

51%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

386
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 603

LEVEL 1

68

11%

LEVEL 2

149

25%

LEVEL 3

202

33%

LEVEL 4

184

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

396
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 644

LEVEL 1

79

12%

LEVEL 2

169

26%

LEVEL 3

192

30%

LEVEL 4

204

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

7

17%

LEVEL 2

19

45%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

10

21%

LEVEL 2

15

32%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

13

28%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

448
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 635

LEVEL 1

39

6%

LEVEL 2

148

23%

LEVEL 3

223

35%

LEVEL 4

225

35%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

474
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 689

LEVEL 1

49

7%

LEVEL 2

166

24%

LEVEL 3

216

31%

LEVEL 4

258

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

50

50%

LEVEL 2

31

31%

LEVEL 3

17

17%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

58

48%

LEVEL 2

44

37%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

490
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 802

LEVEL 1

103

13%

LEVEL 2

209

26%

LEVEL 3

227

28%

LEVEL 4

263

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

390
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

46

8%

LEVEL 2

124

22%

LEVEL 3

189

34%

LEVEL 4

201

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

403
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 604

LEVEL 1

55

9%

LEVEL 2

146

24%

LEVEL 3

179

30%

LEVEL 4

224

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

43

24%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

51

29%

LEVEL 4

27

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

52

25%

LEVEL 2

64

31%

LEVEL 3

50

24%

LEVEL 4

39

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

465
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 731

LEVEL 1

89

12%

LEVEL 2

177

24%

LEVEL 3

238

33%

LEVEL 4

227

31%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

489
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 803

LEVEL 1

106

13%

LEVEL 2

208

26%

LEVEL 3

227

28%

LEVEL 4

262

33%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.