C V STARR INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 603

LEVEL 1

113

19%

LEVEL 2

232

38%

LEVEL 3

200

33%

LEVEL 4

58

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 579

LEVEL 1

133

23%

LEVEL 2

232

40%

LEVEL 3

164

28%

LEVEL 4

50

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

136
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

47

15%

LEVEL 2

127

41%

LEVEL 3

103

33%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

63

22%

LEVEL 2

111

40%

LEVEL 3

81

29%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

122
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

66

23%

LEVEL 2

105

36%

LEVEL 3

97

33%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

70

23%

LEVEL 2

121

41%

LEVEL 3

83

28%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

157
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

108

37%

LEVEL 3

120

41%

LEVEL 4

37

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

93

36%

LEVEL 3

95

37%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

75
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

74

28%

LEVEL 2

111

43%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

70
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

86

31%

LEVEL 2

121

44%

LEVEL 3

57

21%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

253
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

75

14%

LEVEL 2

216

40%

LEVEL 3

197

36%

LEVEL 4

56

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

90

18%

LEVEL 2

209

41%

LEVEL 3

161

32%

LEVEL 4

50

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

38

64%

LEVEL 2

16

27%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

43

62%

LEVEL 2

23

33%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

256
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 542

LEVEL 1

71

13%

LEVEL 2

215

40%

LEVEL 3

198

37%

LEVEL 4

58

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

213
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

99

19%

LEVEL 2

209

40%

LEVEL 3

163

31%

LEVEL 4

50

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

42

69%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

34

59%

LEVEL 2

23

40%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

189
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

34

10%

LEVEL 2

131

37%

LEVEL 3

141

40%

LEVEL 4

48

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

159
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

47

14%

LEVEL 2

125

38%

LEVEL 3

117

35%

LEVEL 4

42

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

79

32%

LEVEL 2

101

41%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

86

35%

LEVEL 2

107

43%

LEVEL 3

47

19%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

258
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 598

LEVEL 1

110

18%

LEVEL 2

230

38%

LEVEL 3

200

33%

LEVEL 4

58

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.