MAHOPAC CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

429
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 854

LEVEL 1

121

14%

LEVEL 2

304

36%

LEVEL 3

324

38%

LEVEL 4

105

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

461
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 950

LEVEL 1

156

16%

LEVEL 2

333

35%

LEVEL 3

330

35%

LEVEL 4

131

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

238
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

38

9%

LEVEL 2

147

35%

LEVEL 3

174

41%

LEVEL 4

64

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

254
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

54

12%

LEVEL 2

149

33%

LEVEL 3

178

39%

LEVEL 4

76

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

191
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

83

19%

LEVEL 2

157

36%

LEVEL 3

150

35%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

207
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

102

21%

LEVEL 2

184

37%

LEVEL 3

152

31%

LEVEL 4

55

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

37%

LEVEL 3

13

43%

LEVEL 4

6

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

12

38%

LEVEL 3

11

34%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

334
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 604

LEVEL 1

74

12%

LEVEL 2

196

32%

LEVEL 3

250

41%

LEVEL 4

84

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

353
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 662

LEVEL 1

88

13%

LEVEL 2

221

33%

LEVEL 3

253

38%

LEVEL 4

100

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

5

22%

LEVEL 2

11

48%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

6

23%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

9

35%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

63
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

41

23%

LEVEL 2

75

42%

LEVEL 3

50

28%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

69
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

56

27%

LEVEL 2

85

40%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

415
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 763

LEVEL 1

72

9%

LEVEL 2

276

36%

LEVEL 3

311

41%

LEVEL 4

104

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

446
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 853

LEVEL 1

103

12%

LEVEL 2

304

36%

LEVEL 3

318

37%

LEVEL 4

128

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

49

54%

LEVEL 2

28

31%

LEVEL 3

13

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

53

55%

LEVEL 2

29

30%

LEVEL 3

12

12%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

427
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 836

LEVEL 1

114

14%

LEVEL 2

295

35%

LEVEL 3

322

39%

LEVEL 4

105

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

460
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 939

LEVEL 1

149

16%

LEVEL 2

330

35%

LEVEL 3

329

35%

LEVEL 4

131

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

9

50%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

7

64%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

382
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 715

LEVEL 1

85

12%

LEVEL 2

248

35%

LEVEL 3

284

40%

LEVEL 4

98

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

405
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 765

LEVEL 1

105

14%

LEVEL 2

255

33%

LEVEL 3

281

37%

LEVEL 4

124

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

36

26%

LEVEL 2

56

40%

LEVEL 3

40

29%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

51

28%

LEVEL 2

78

42%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

426
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 849

LEVEL 1

121

14%

LEVEL 2

302

36%

LEVEL 3

322

38%

LEVEL 4

104

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

455
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 940

LEVEL 1

155

16%

LEVEL 2

330

35%

LEVEL 3

324

34%

LEVEL 4

131

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

6

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.