PHOENIX CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 644

LEVEL 1

165

26%

LEVEL 2

251

39%

LEVEL 3

178

28%

LEVEL 4

50

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 663

LEVEL 1

207

31%

LEVEL 2

223

34%

LEVEL 3

167

25%

LEVEL 4

66

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

130
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

62

20%

LEVEL 2

121

39%

LEVEL 3

100

32%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

119
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

79

25%

LEVEL 2

116

37%

LEVEL 3

82

26%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

103

31%

LEVEL 2

130

39%

LEVEL 3

78

24%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

114
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

128

37%

LEVEL 2

107

31%

LEVEL 3

85

24%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

8

47%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

10

50%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

216
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 610

LEVEL 1

160

26%

LEVEL 2

234

38%

LEVEL 3

166

27%

LEVEL 4

50

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

222
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 627

LEVEL 1

198

32%

LEVEL 2

207

33%

LEVEL 3

158

25%

LEVEL 4

64

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 580

LEVEL 1

114

20%

LEVEL 2

241

42%

LEVEL 3

175

30%

LEVEL 4

50

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

229
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 600

LEVEL 1

158

26%

LEVEL 2

213

36%

LEVEL 3

163

27%

LEVEL 4

66

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

51

80%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

49

78%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

139
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

52

17%

LEVEL 2

115

38%

LEVEL 3

104

34%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

150
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

64

20%

LEVEL 2

103

32%

LEVEL 3

106

33%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

113

33%

LEVEL 2

136

40%

LEVEL 3

74

22%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

143

41%

LEVEL 2

120

35%

LEVEL 3

61

18%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

221
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 621

LEVEL 1

158

25%

LEVEL 2

242

39%

LEVEL 3

173

28%

LEVEL 4

48

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

229
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 643

LEVEL 1

193

30%

LEVEL 2

221

34%

LEVEL 3

163

25%

LEVEL 4

66

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

14

70%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.