Skip to Content
Main content

CENTRAL SQUARE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

129

31%

LEVEL 2

137

33%

LEVEL 3

94

23%

LEVEL 4

51

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

153

31%

LEVEL 2

153

31%

LEVEL 3

115

23%

LEVEL 4

76

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

39

21%

LEVEL 2

68

36%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

47

22%

LEVEL 2

67

31%

LEVEL 3

58

27%

LEVEL 4

42

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

90

40%

LEVEL 2

69

31%

LEVEL 3

43

19%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

106

37%

LEVEL 2

86

30%

LEVEL 3

57

20%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

135
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

111

30%

LEVEL 2

129

34%

LEVEL 3

87

23%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

175
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

141

31%

LEVEL 2

144

31%

LEVEL 3

105

23%

LEVEL 4

70

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

11

65%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

98

27%

LEVEL 2

128

35%

LEVEL 3

92

25%

LEVEL 4

51

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

122

27%

LEVEL 2

143

32%

LEVEL 3

111

25%

LEVEL 4

76

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

31

74%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

31

69%

LEVEL 2

10

22%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

47

20%

LEVEL 2

83

35%

LEVEL 3

67

28%

LEVEL 4

41

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

54

19%

LEVEL 2

89

31%

LEVEL 3

81

28%

LEVEL 4

61

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

82

47%

LEVEL 2

54

31%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

99

47%

LEVEL 2

64

30%

LEVEL 3

34

16%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.