MEXICO CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

203

36%

LEVEL 2

178

32%

LEVEL 3

149

27%

LEVEL 4

29

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 642

LEVEL 1

234

36%

LEVEL 2

224

35%

LEVEL 3

131

20%

LEVEL 4

53

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

80

30%

LEVEL 2

87

33%

LEVEL 3

79

30%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

94

32%

LEVEL 2

107

37%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

123

42%

LEVEL 2

91

31%

LEVEL 3

70

24%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

140

40%

LEVEL 2

117

34%

LEVEL 3

72

21%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

172
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 538

LEVEL 1

195

36%

LEVEL 2

171

32%

LEVEL 3

143

27%

LEVEL 4

29

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

176
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 610

LEVEL 1

219

36%

LEVEL 2

215

35%

LEVEL 3

125

20%

LEVEL 4

51

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

136

29%

LEVEL 2

159

34%

LEVEL 3

140

30%

LEVEL 4

29

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

162

31%

LEVEL 2

192

36%

LEVEL 3

123

23%

LEVEL 4

52

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

67

71%

LEVEL 2

19

20%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

72

64%

LEVEL 2

32

28%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

56

24%

LEVEL 2

74

32%

LEVEL 3

82

35%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

74

29%

LEVEL 2

88

34%

LEVEL 3

65

25%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

147

45%

LEVEL 2

104

32%

LEVEL 3

67

20%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

160

42%

LEVEL 2

136

36%

LEVEL 3

66

17%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

175
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 540

LEVEL 1

193

36%

LEVEL 2

172

32%

LEVEL 3

147

27%

LEVEL 4

28

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

183
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 629

LEVEL 1

224

36%

LEVEL 2

222

35%

LEVEL 3

131

21%

LEVEL 4

52

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

10

53%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

10

77%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.