Skip to Content
Main content

KENNEY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

166

46%

LEVEL 2

130

36%

LEVEL 3

48

13%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

151

42%

LEVEL 2

119

33%

LEVEL 3

63

18%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

63

36%

LEVEL 2

71

40%

LEVEL 3

32

18%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

59

35%

LEVEL 2

58

35%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

103

55%

LEVEL 2

59

32%

LEVEL 3

16

9%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

92

49%

LEVEL 2

61

32%

LEVEL 3

26

14%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

63
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

151

44%

LEVEL 2

128

37%

LEVEL 3

46

13%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

81
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

143

42%

LEVEL 2

114

34%

LEVEL 3

58

17%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

136

43%

LEVEL 2

118

37%

LEVEL 3

47

15%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

115

37%

LEVEL 2

112

36%

LEVEL 3

61

20%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

30

68%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

36

78%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

36

33%

LEVEL 2

39

36%

LEVEL 3

22

20%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

22

28%

LEVEL 2

25

32%

LEVEL 3

24

31%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

130

51%

LEVEL 2

91

36%

LEVEL 3

26

10%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

129

46%

LEVEL 2

94

34%

LEVEL 3

39

14%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

61
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

162

46%

LEVEL 2

128

36%

LEVEL 3

42

12%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

85
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

148

42%

LEVEL 2

117

33%

LEVEL 3

62

18%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.